Text
1. The plaintiff (Appointed)'s claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. 1) The Plaintiff (Appointed Party) is the deceased F (hereinafter “the deceased”).
(2) The Defendant B Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant A Hospital”) is an employer of the Gu River, the Gu River, and the faculty G, and the Defendant Incorporated Foundation is an incorporated foundation that operates an I Hospital located in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “Defendant B Hospital”).
B. On April 29, 2015, the deceased was diagnosed as the oral cancer (e.g., flat cancer; squanoma) as a result of the organization examination at the J Hospital on April 29, 2015. On the same day, the deceased sought to leave the Gu dental department outside of the Defendant 1 Hospital. Defendant 1 Hospital G was hospitalized with the deceased on the day of the cancer examination. (ii) Defendant 1 Hospital medical personnel conducted blood examination, required examination, tissue pathology examination, CT, MRI, and PET (dua-dua) image examination, etc. on the deceased hospitalized in accordance with the prescription of G professor.
The Deceased discharged on May 4, 2015.
3) 2015. 5. 3.부터 같은 달 6.경까지 보고된 위 검사결과는, 망인의 좌측 어금니 뒤 삼각(구치후삼각; retromolar trigono) 부위에 약 1.5cm 크기의 악성종양(암)이 관찰되고, 위 종양덩어리가 주변의 협근(빰의 넓고 얇은 근육, 볼근; buccinator m.)과 익돌하악봉선(날개아래턱솔기; pterygomandibular raphe)을 침범하고 있으며, 특히 좌측 경부 림프절(level Ib)에 장경 24mm 정도인 괴사된 림프절이 관찰되어 암이 림프절까지 침범(전이)하고 있다는 것이었다. 그러나 뚜렷한 골파괴 소견은 관찰되지 않았다(즉, 암이 뼈에까지 전이된 것은 아님). 4) 망인은 2015. 5. 13. 위 검사결과를 확인하기 위해 피고1 병원 구강악안면외과를 내원하였다.
G Professors explained the results of the examination and carried out an operation plan for the Deceased.
However, the deceased is currently exempted from the law.