Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. From March 30, 2011 to June 21, 2011, the Defendant: (a) visited a PC room in which it is difficult to know the trade name in the home country of the prime-si from March 30, 2011 to June 21, 201; (b) deposited KRW 4,960,000 over 38 times in total as indicated in the attached crime list; and (c) deposited the same amount of the game money from the operator; and (d) predicted the result of various overseas and domestic sports games provided with the game money from the operator in advance in a way that the amount of dividends is determined by the rate of dividend if the Defendant gets paid dividends according to the rate of dividend; and (d) exchanged the game money to receive KRW 2,94,50,500 on 11 occasions in a way that it is not refunded.
2. On August 7, 2010, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “Around August 7, 2016, the Defendant called the Victim F engaged in the No. 201 E in the No. Donju-si, and the No. Donbuk-si, “I will use the No. 201 North Korea, but will settle when discharged.”
However, the Defendant, at the time, was liable for the amount equivalent to KRW 450 million, and there was no intention or ability to pay the compensation for the Nompt North Korean siren to the victim.
The defendant acquired the 750,000 won of the market price from the injured party on the same day and acquired it by fraud.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of the suspect against the defendant (including G statements);
1. Each report on investigation;
1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of forwarding documents;
1. Relevant Article 246 of the Criminal Act and Articles 246 (1) and 347 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of gambling and the choice of imprisonment) concerning the crime;
1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;
1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;