Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit
Seoul Administrative Court 201Guhap14319 ( October 28, 2011)
Case Number of the previous trial
Seocho 2010west 1098 ( October 15, 201)
Title
Methods for assessing land where separate buildings independently from apartment houses belong;
Summary
(As with the judgment of the court of first instance) In the appraisal of the value of inherited property, the attached building is a separate building independent of the apartment, so it cannot be deemed that the disposition that calculated the value of the land is unlawful without considering the value of the attached building.
Cases
2011Nu39235 Revocation of the imposition of inheritance tax
Plaintiff and appellant
고QQ 외4명
Defendant, Appellant
Head of Yongsan Tax Office
Judgment of the first instance court
Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2011Guhap14319 decided October 28, 2011
Conclusion of Pleadings
May 8, 2012
Imposition of Judgment
May 25, 2012
Text
1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.
Purport of claim and appeal
The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked.
The Defendant’s disposition of imposition of KRW 000 on December 1, 2009 against the Plaintiffs is revoked in the aggregate of the inheritance tax of KRW 000 on the attached list belonging to the year 2008.
Reasons
1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;
The court's explanation on this case is identical to the entry of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing this as is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act
2. Conclusion
Therefore, the plaintiffs' claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and all appeals of the plaintiffs are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.