A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, the vehicle storage loan agreement, loan certificate, and loan certificate in the name of C.

A. Considering the fact that the Defendant was planned to reverse his statement several times, and that the Defendant did not seem to be able to fully reflect the entire liability to S et al., the crime of this case was committed within the repeated crime period, and that there was no agreement with the victims, etc., it is decided as per Disposition, taking into account the equity in cases where the judgment was rendered simultaneously with the crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, which became final and conclusive.

The acquittal portion

1. At around 14:00 on May 23, 201, the Defendant sold an ONF rocketing car to P within the used car trading complex located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Gangnam-gu, and forged the private document under the name of C and delivered it to the above P who is unaware of such circumstances. A.

The Defendant forged one copy of the vehicle storage loan agreement in the name of C, T, Chungcheongnam-gun N apartment ***-307, U, entered in the debtor column of the vehicle storage loan agreement in an irregular manner.

B. The Defendant stated in blank that “A”, “creditor D”, and “a debtor shall lend a creditor D with a cash of KRW 7 million until June 10, 201,” and stated in blank that “C shall be repaid by June 10, 201,” and forged a copy of the loan certificate under the name of “C, 5, 2010, 201, i.e., a private document concerning rights and obligations.”

C. The Defendant stated in blank that “C transferred theO to D” and stated “C” at the lower right side of the blank, and forged one copy of the letter of waiver of the vehicle in the name of C, a private document concerning rights and obligations.

2. The judgment is based on the witness's legal statement and the police's statement on P as evidence corresponding to the above facts charged, but the above evidence alone is that the defendant forged each of the above documents and used them.