logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.09.20 2014가합57026
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The defendant,

A. The Plaintiff A is 648,115,497 won, Plaintiff B, C, D, E, and F respectively, and each of the above amounts.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the parties A is that the Plaintiff was damaged by the 3-4 conical expansion of drilling and the removal of conical signboards from the medical staff of the Defendant hospital in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”) operated by the Defendant, and the Plaintiff E, and F are the parents of the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff B is the wife of the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff C, and the Plaintiff were the children of the Plaintiff.

B. (1) Plaintiff A was working as an operator of the manufacturing machinery at the Dong Seo-gu Sym (Seoul), a corporation located in 252 as of the Sinscopic ecopic scopic ecopic ecopic ecopic ecopic ecopic ecopic ecopic ecopic ecopic ecopic ecopic ecopic ecopic ecopic ecopic ecopic ecopic ecopic scopic ecopic ecopic ecopic ecopic ecopic ecopic ecopic ecopic ecopic ecopic ecopic ecopic ecopic ecopic ecopic ecopic ecopic ecopic

3) On June 21, 2013, Plaintiff A decided that the Defendant Hospital would undergo an ex post facto expansion surgery and conical signboard saving surgery. On June 23, 2013, Plaintiff A hospitalized the Defendant Hospital to undergo an surgery at around 15:40, and there was no special error in Plaintiff A’s bruence, sense of view, or luminous function. (4) On June 23, 2013, the medical staff at the Defendant Hospital provided an explanation to Plaintiff A of the operation method, surgery merger (e.g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g.

5) Plaintiff A around 08:40 on June 24, 2013, around 013, around 08:40, for Plaintiff A to the right side of the following: (a) 3-4 conical expansion and conical signboards removal method (hereinafter “instant surgery”).

6) The Plaintiff A implemented the instant surgery to the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital immediately after the instant surgery.

arrow