Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, each of the defendants B and C shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A The secretary general of the E Agricultural Partnership from around 2007 to January 2016, and Defendant B was the representative director of the E Agricultural Partnership from around 2006 to June 201, and Defendant C operated the F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “F”) for the business of manufacturing excreta for livestock purposes from around June 2001 to April 201.

The victim Republic of Korea and the victim iron farm group were designated as a subsidized project to convert livestock excreta into manure and liquid manure and to promote the use of livestock excreta as a natural circulation farming method (e.g., liquefied facilities and compost facilities) and to provide subsidies to the E agricultural partnership that applied for a project to jointly create livestock excreta in the name of the agricultural partnership G (e.g., liquefied facilities) among the above projects, to cover KRW 8.45 million out of the total project cost of KRW 1.199 billion (e.g., KRW 357 million, Do expenses, KRW 700,000,000, KRW 416 million,000,000 for military expenses, KRW 345 million,000 among the total project cost of the above projects (e.g., KRW 357,000,000, KRW 416,000,000 for military expenses, KRW 345,000 for the remainder (loan).

As Defendant A and B were faced with difficult situations in which it is difficult for the E farming association corporation to raise self-responsibility, Defendant C and the F operator of the construction business chain prepare a contract to unfix the construction cost with Defendant C and the F operator, return the unftened price from F and deposit it into the fund execution account for the subsidized business, thereby creating an appearance of the subsidy set out in the said business, which is the same as the performance of all the self-responsibility.

Accordingly, around December 2008, Defendant A and B made and made a contract, tax account statement, etc. to Defendant C with the payment of the construction cost, and when the payment of the construction cost is made, Defendant C demanded to return KRW 150 million out of the payment of the construction cost. Accordingly, Defendant C returned KRW 150 million out of the payment of the E agricultural partnership around July 15, 2009 to E through H(I) account, and Defendant A and B deposited KRW 350 million,50 million, including the money returned around July 2009, into the fund execution account of the subsidized project.