logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2016.06.01 2015고단1260
무고등
Text

[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2015 Highest 2553: Fraud against Defendant A and B] Defendant A was the representative director of the E-agricultural association that produces green tea beverages in the Southern Gun from February 1996 to August 2013, 201, and Defendant B operated G operating the freezing machinery business from Gwangju Western F.

In order to solve the apprehension of supply and demand of agricultural products produced in mountainous districts in Jeonnam-do and Bosung-gun, and to enhance the added value of farmers through shipment control, "the 2008 Agricultural Organization's low-ion storage of agricultural products in the 2008" was implemented, and 50% of the remaining 50% of the construction cost if the 50% of the 50% of the 50% of the 50% of the 50% of the 50% of the 50% of the 50% of the 50% of the 50% of the 50% of the 50% of the 50% of the 50% of the 50% of the 50% of the 50

Around that time, agricultural cooperatives were selected as a subsidized project operator by submitting a letter of undertaking.

On August 14, 2009, the Defendants prepared a construction contract and a statement of execution of project costs to the E farming association office to the effect that “the amount of the construction contract is KRW 300 million and the amount of the construction contract is KRW 150 million among them is borne by the agricultural association.” The Defendants submitted to the person in charge of Bosung-si Office a statement of execution of the construction contract and project costs.

However, in fact, the Defendants submitted a construction contract of KRW 300,000,000 which is less than KRW 1550,000,000 (self-responsibility) since they did not have any intent to bear self-paid costs.

In collusion, the Defendants submitted a false construction contract and the execution statement of project costs as above, and received the total of KRW 150 million from the victims on June 26, 2009, KRW 105,000,000, and KRW 45,000 on December 31, 2009 from the victims to the Agricultural Cooperative Deposit Account (Account Number: H) in the name of the E Agricultural Cooperative.

Summary of Evidence

Defendant .

arrow