logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2018.04.17 2017가단833
공유물분할
Text

1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) receives each corresponding amount from the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) as stated in the separate sheet 3.

Reasons

1. The facts of recognition are as follows: (a) the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant; hereinafter “Plaintiff”) and the Defendant B and the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff; hereinafter “Defendant”) own real estate listed in the separate sheet 1 to 6.

Plaintiff

38,235,5,519,827,65,800, 17,442,351,709,314,855 Defendant B B 38,235,519,827,665,800, 386,614,981,273,474, Defendant C38,235,235,527,827,638,261,546,247, Defendant D38,235,519,827,65,638,785,286,785,275, and the following list of real estate:

Plaintiff

With respect to the method of partition of each real estate listed in the attached Table 12,672,017/12,672,017/17/12,00 of Defendant E-578,678,391,711/378,711, Defendant C578,391,7780/12,672,017/12,672,017 of Defendant E-578,391,780, 12,672,017/391,780 of Defendant F578,391,780, and 12,672,018 (hereinafter “each real estate of this case”) and the Defendants, there was no agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendants.

The value of each real estate of this case is as follows:

(hereinafter) Real estate indicated in paragraph (1) 2,17,62,00 won in real estate indicated in paragraph (3) 35,348,40 won in real estate indicated in paragraph (4) 45,945,80 won in real estate indicated in paragraph (2) 35,348,40 won in paragraph (3) 2,17,62,00 won in real estate indicated in paragraph (5) 25,62,00 won in paragraph (6) 87,624,600 won in real estate indicated in paragraph (7) 124,705,000 won in paragraph (8) 8,535,000 won in real estate described in paragraph (9) 30,368,000 won in real estate, 280 won in total, 450,000 won in real estate, 208,61,6301 to 400 won in real estate, 605 won in each of real estate.

2. Determination as to the principal lawsuit

A. According to the fact of finding the claim for partition of co-owned property, the plaintiff is one of the co-owners of each real estate of this case, unless there are special circumstances.

arrow