(영문) 부산지방법원서부지원 2017.10.20 2017가단102783

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 부산지방법원서부지원 2017.10.20 2017가단102783

건물명도(인도)

Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

A. At the same time, the Plaintiff received KRW 8,000,000 from the Plaintiff, buildings listed in the attached Table 1.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. C, the owner of the building listed in the separate sheet No. 1 (hereinafter “instant building”) was the Defendant; ① on August 16, 2012, the part (A) of the building attached Table No. 2 connected in sequence 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, and 1 among the 1st floor of the instant building, which was 41.68 square meters [the part (A) of the instant building for convenience; hereinafter “the part of the instant building”) was 8 million won, monthly rent, 300,000 won, and 24 months from August 16, 2012 to August 15, 2014; ② on February 21, 2014, the part (a) of the instant building was leased in sequence from 30,000 won to 30,000 won to 24,000 won to 30,000 won to 304,000 won to 30,000 won to 274.

B. Each of the above lease agreements has been implicitly renewed between C and the Defendant even after the expiration of each contract term.

C. The Plaintiff is a regional housing association established for the purpose of a housing construction project of 14,096 square meters of the Seosan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D Daywon, which obtained authorization for the establishment of the association from the Busan Metropolitan Government Office around October 2016.

The Plaintiff purchased the instant building from C on July 18, 2016 and sold it for the same year.

9.6. Completion of the registration of ownership transfer.

E. On October 4, 2016 and January 24, 2017, the Plaintiff notified the Defendant through C that the Plaintiff did not wish to renew each of the instant lease agreement.

F. On April 26, 2017, the Plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit and served a copy of the complaint containing an expression of intent to refuse the renewal of each of the instant lease agreements on June 7, 2017, and maintained the intent to refuse the renewal thereof by the date of closing the argument in the instant case.

【Ground for recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, each entry of Gap 1 through 4 (including virtual numbers) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. Part 1 of the instant building (A) is asserted by both parties, and a lease agreement on the part of the instant building (A) is concluded by C.

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.03.07 2016가단85089

-서울북부지방법원 2020.03.17 2019가단18942

-부산지방법원서부지원 2017.12.08 2017가단3404

-부산지방법원 서부지원 2017. 10. 20. 선고 2017가단102783 판결

-부산지방법원서부지원 2020.01.22 2018가단9782