logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.02.08 2017고단5284
특수상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 30, 2017, the Defendant was driving, at around 18:00 on the 18:20-day, Obaba in the state of under the influence of alcohol 0.120% of alcohol while under the influence of alcohol 0.120% from the 6.5km section to the bus stops at the large university located in the 6.5km north 1-lane 65m. on the same day from the 18:22 on the same day.

2. On April 30, 2017, the Defendant: (a) 18:27, and around 18:27, but was on board a large-scale university bus stop located in the north 65-ro one-way north, and went out of the site; (b) the Defendant driven the above Oba, which is a dangerous object to prevent the above Oba in front of the Obaba, without reporting the victim; (c) operated the above Oba, which is a dangerous object to prevent the above Obaba in front of the Obaba, and led the victim to approximately two weeks of physical parts of D, thereby taking approximately two weeks of physical parts of the victim D.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Statement on the circumstances of driving at home, and response to a request for appraisal (written appraisal of alcohol in blood);

1. A medical certificate;

1. The defendant was found to have been in excess of the defendant's day-to-day fluor, and the defendant was found to have been in excess of the defendant's day-to-day fluor in the back fluor, although the defendant was in excess of the defendant's day-to-day fluor video ( according to the black fluor video, the victim was found to have been in front of the defendant's day-to-day fluor in the back fluor.

Even if the Defendant was aware that the Defendant had been predicted and continued to have been able to mislead the victim when he or she proceeded with the lower judgment, the intention of special injury is sufficiently recognized.

Application of Statutes

1. Articles 148-2(2)2 and 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of drinking alcohol) concerning criminal facts, and Articles 258-2(1) and 257(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of special injury) concerning criminal facts.

arrow