logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.07.26 2018나80263
손해배상(자)
Text

1. Of the parts concerning the claims of plaintiffs A and B in the judgment of the court of first instance, the following amount exceeds the amount ordered to be paid.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited the same reasoning as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition or dismissal as follows, and thus, it is acceptable to accept it as it is by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

2. The fourth parallel of the judgment of the court of first instance “8 lanes” shall be raised to “six lanes.”

The attached Form 1 of the judgment of the court of first instance and the attached Form 2 retirement allowance calculation table shall be replaced by the attached Form 1 of the judgment of the court of first instance and the attached Form 2 retirement allowance calculation table.

The 17th "(Evidence A7)" following the 4th 16th 16th son of the judgment of the first instance shall be followed as follows:

Inasmuch as the payment of KRW 2,916,670 per month was received as salary (each entry in the evidence No. 7 and No. 31; the Plaintiffs asserted that KRW 100,000,000 are included in the deceased’s wage income from food and Handphone communications in addition to salary; however, according to the statements in the evidence No. 3 and No. 29 through No. 31, the above company may recognize the fact that the above company provided heavy meals to workers and paid KRW 9-120,00 per month for food in lieu of the provision of heavy meals only to employees, including the deceased. In light of these circumstances, other benefit items are considered as compensating the deceased for the food and communication expenses required in the process of performing external work as an agent for the business division. Accordingly, this part of the allegation cannot be accepted as compensation for the wage income that serves as the basis for calculating the lost income.

3,413,730 won in the fifth 9th eth eth eth 9 judgment of the first instance court shall be deemed to be “30,709,911 won”.

The 5th to 6th 1th 200 shall be followed by the following putting 5th 21 to 6th 3 pages of the first instance judgment.

“1) Amount subject to inheritance: 297,409,740 won (property damage = 247,409,740 won + 50,000,000 won)’s shares in inheritance: The inheritance amount of Plaintiff A5/3, Plaintiff B2/53: The inheritance amount of Plaintiff A178,445,84 won, Plaintiff B18,963,896 constituted six-way conduct in the first instance judgment of the court of first instance.

arrow