1. Defendants A and B shall be punished by a fine of 4 million won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

The Defendants are the defendants.

Punishment of the crime

D is engaged in the business of importing and exporting shellfish, etc. in Busan Western E building F, and is engaged in the business of importing and exporting shellfish and selling shellfish in Jung-gu, Incheon. H is engaged in the business of operating J in Jung-gu, Incheon, and the business of exporting and importing shellfish and wholesale and selling shellfish. K is engaged in the business of exporting and importing and selling shellfish in Jung-gu, Busan. K is engaged in Q in the business of exporting and importing and selling fish products and wholesale and selling fish products. Defendant A is engaged in the business of importing and exporting marine products and wholesale and retailing marine products in Seoyangyang-gun, Gangwon-si, and Defendant B is engaged in the business of importing and exporting marine products and wholesaleing marine products in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Busan, and is engaged in the business of importing and exporting marine products and wholesaleing marine products.

1. Defendant A and B had preference to the domestic origin in Japan, and the import clearance procedure in Japan had much rapid and simple domestic origin compared to the Chinese origin, and expressed the Chinese origin as a false domestic origin to be exported to Japan. Defendant A and B had expressed and exported the Chinese origin in the name of J operated by H with H, which had been known to the general public, under the name of J operated by H.

K knew of all the above circumstances, K prepared a mountainous district certificate under the name of the head of Si/Gun having jurisdiction over the place of the production and a certificate of origin for the issuance of Y, and decided to take charge of the export clearance procedure in N it operates.

On the other hand, D had the mind of being supplied with China's bio-productions necessary for the export of Japan from the East coast manufacturers, and requested O, Defendant A, Defendant B, and U to remove the country of origin labeling attached to B, or to put it into the "non-Korean pre-use network" without the country of origin labeling, and accepted it byO, Defendants A, B, and U.