logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017. 12. 01. 선고 2017누62480 판결
주권상장법인의 대주주가 주식을 양도한 경우 양도소득세 납세의무가 있음[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul Administrative Court-2016-Gu Group-57390 ( October 27, 2017)

Case Number of the previous trial

Cho High-2016-Seoul Government-0193 (Law No. 31, 2016)

Title

If the majority shareholders of a stock-listed corporation transfer stocks, they are liable to pay capital gains tax.

Summary

(As in the judgment of the court of first instance) If the plaintiff and related parties constitute a major shareholder of a stock-listed corporation, they are liable to pay capital gains tax.

Related statutes

Article 94 of the Income Tax Act: Scope of Transfer Income

Article 157 (Scope of Securities Depository Securities and Large Stockholders) of the Enforcement Decree of the Income Tax Act

Cases

2017Nu62480 Revocation of Disposition of Imposing capital gains tax, etc.

Plaintiff and appellant

The AA

Defendant, Appellant

1. BB director of the tax office;

2. The head of ○○-si BB;

Judgment of the first instance court

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2016Gudan57390 decided June 27, 2017

Conclusion of Pleadings

November 17, 2017

Imposition of Judgment

December 1, 2017

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. Each tax imposition disposition in the attached Form that the Defendants made against the Plaintiff shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Quotation of the reasons for the judgment of the first instance;

The reasons for this decision are as follows: Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants shall be dismissed in its entirety as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in its conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in its entirety as it is without merit.

arrow