(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.04.13 2016고정2598

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.04.13 2016고정2598

모욕등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 1, 2016, the Defendant, “2016 High 2598,” around 16:47, 2016, at the management office of Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the Defendant made a public insult of the victim D, the president of the council of occupants of the apartment building, and the victim, who recorded the conversations between the Defendant and the victim before and after the Defendant, etc. as a matter of a dispute, and made a public insult of the victim by making the victim a large voice, “I see, equally live, and I see,” and “I see, I am the victim.”

The defendant 2016 High 2599 is a person who works as the managing director of Suwon-si C Apartment-gu, Suwon-si, and the F is the representative director of the tenant of the above apartment.

1. On May 27, 2016, the Defendant forged a private document as if the F had voluntarily stated the name of “F” in the column of the applicant column for the application for the grant of multi-family housing sent at several cities for the purpose of uttering at the above C Apartment Management Office, and the F had expressed his/her intent to apply for the grant.

2. The defendant who has forged a forged application for subsidies to multi-family housing under the name of F on the same day, as Paragraph (1).

A forged private document was used by the method of receiving it.

Summary of Evidence

"2016 High 2598"

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Recording notes;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel acknowledged the fact that the defendant made a statement as stated in the judgment of the court below [the defendant and his defense counsel], but requested the victim D to make a recording of the conversation in the residents' public service center, but the victim refused it and gave a warning to the victim's escape, etc., and therefore, the defendant made the above statement to the purport that the victim's escape would cause it to go against social rules and thus, it constitutes a legitimate act.

However, the occurrence of the instant case is recognized by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court.

유사 판례

-서울북부지방법원 2017.08.24 2016고단2606

-광주지방법원 2016.05.19 2016고정475

-제주지방법원 2016.09.23 2016고정364

-제주지방법원 2018.02.28 2017고정18

-서울북부지방법원 2017.07.19 2017고정342