logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019. 02. 14. 선고 2018나55937 판결
쟁점 채권 양도가 통정허위표시에 해당하여 무효인지 여부[국패]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Suwon District Court-2017-Ban-4009 ( October 10, 2018)

Title

Whether the transfer of bonds at issue constitutes a false declaration of conspiracy and thus null and void

Summary

There is no objective circumstance that the transfer of the issue bonds is null and void by a false conspiracy, and it is decided by the notice of the transfer of claims with a fixed date and by the order of provisional attachment after the arrival of the third debtor (in the case of the transfer of claims, after the debtor).

Cases

2018Na55937 Confirmation of Claim for Payment of Deposit

Plaintiff, Appellant

DoAA

Defendant, appellant and appellant

Korea

Judgment of the first instance court

Suwon District Court Decision 2017Gadan4009 Decided 10, 2018

Conclusion of Pleadings

201.01.24

Imposition of Judgment

2019.02.14

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1. Purport of claim

BBB made a deposit payment claim for KRW 71,255,607 out of KRW 23,954,190 deposited by Suwon District Court No. 7578 of July 5, 2013, the Suwon District Court confirmed that the Plaintiff is entitled to the deposit payment claim for KRW 71,255,607.

2. Purport of appeal

The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The defendant's grounds for appeal do not differ significantly from the allegations in the first instance court, and it is recognized that the fact-finding and decision in the first instance court are legitimate in view of the evidence submitted in the first instance court and the testimony of the competentCC as a witness in the first instance court. This court's decision is the same as the statement in the grounds for the first instance court's decision, and therefore, it is acceptable in accordance with

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the decision of the first instance court is justifiable, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed.

arrow