logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2013.12.04 2013고단6148
사서명위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 03:45 on June 5, 2013, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol by 0.22% at the 0.22% of alcohol level, the Defendant driven the CTT 100 Oral Bab owned at the section of approximately 3.3 km from the Cheongnam-dong, Cheongdo-dong, Busan, to the front day of the Yaeng-dong, Cheongdo-dong, Cheongdo-dong, Busan, for approximately 3.3 km.

2. On September 31, 201, the Defendant: (a) notified the Busan District Court of summary order of a fine of three million won due to indecent act by force; and (b) failed to pay the said fine on May 31, 201, the Defendant was designated on September 31, 2012.

On June 5, 2013, at around 04:02, the Defendant, as stated in Paragraph 1, was discovered to the police due to the fact that he driven a drunk, proposed that he was named B, which requires an assistant D belonging to the Busan Youngdo Police Station Traffic Investigation Team, who is the owner of Ortoba, to present an identification card to drive in B, and signed to the effect that he was “B” after the signature of the FDA for the signature of the FDA on the result of the influence of drinking driving.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged B’s signature for the purpose of exercising the right.

The Defendant continued to write “B” at the bottom of the part stating “I, as a person subject to the cancellation of license, confirm that the contents are identical to the facts, and if you recognize and unfair as a result of the measurement, I sign it at the bottom of the “B” and sign it.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged the driver column B, which is a private document related to confirmation of facts, among the written report on the state-owned driver statement.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning B;

1. Notification of the result of the control of drinking driving (No. 14 in the evidence list);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on the statement of his/her oral statement (No. 15 in the evidence list);

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Article 148-2 of the Road Traffic Act concerning the crime and the choice of punishment;

arrow