1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. 1) Plaintiff A’s agricultural partnership (hereinafter “Plaintiff Association”) is a party’s status, etc.

(2) The purpose of the Plaintiff’s joint purchase of feed and the protection of the rights and interests of sweaks is to jointly purchase feed, and to operate 28 Si/Gun branches in 7 Dos (KW, Chungcheongnam, Chungcheongnam, Chungcheongbuk, Jeonnam, Jeonbuk, Jeonbuk, Jeju, and Chungcheongnambuk), and to operate 70 representatives, including the representative director (president of the Association), and the secretary general of the Plaintiff’s Association from April 201 to the present date. Defendant C is a person in the position of the deputy representative director. Defendant C is a general secretary general, director general, director general, director general, and vice president of the Plaintiff’s Association; Defendant D is a former director general, Defendant F is a former director general, Defendant H is a former director general, and Defendant H is a former director general, and Defendant H is a former business director.

(B) The Defendant C, who was an auditor of the Plaintiff Association on April 25, 2014, was released from the Plaintiff Association on May 25, 2014, and was expelled from the Plaintiff Association on May 25, 2014. (3) The Plaintiff Association, at the general meeting of the settlement of accounts and representatives held on April 3, 2014, was elected as the president of the Association and the election of the secretary general. The Plaintiff and the Defendant C, as the candidates for each Association president, participated in the election of the Plaintiff B, D, and E as the head of the Association and the Secretary General. (b) The Defendant C, who was an auditor of the Plaintiff Association, was elected as the Plaintiff Association head of the Association, and the Plaintiff B, as the director of the Plaintiff Association. On April 3, 2014, after conducting a regular audit in 2014, was pointed out in relation to the excessive appropriation of funds and operating expenses of Plaintiff I and the representative director of the Plaintiff Association.

2) Thereafter, around April 15, 2014, Plaintiff B expressed the position that the former incumbent officers of the Plaintiff Association would accept the Plaintiff’s request for disclosure of the details of operation at the Central Steering Committee meeting held. 3) However, Plaintiff B, on April 16, 2014, had a friendly speech about the operation of the Association.