Defendants publicly notify the summary of the judgment of acquittal of each of the Defendants.

On September 2, 2011, the Defendants of the public prosecution room were sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years in the year and June of each year in the Seoul Central District Court for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, a deadly weapon, etc.). At present, the appellate court is continuing to be the case No. 2011No3449.

Defendant

A on October 28, 2010, the judgment confirming the invalidity of the election of Nonindicted Party I, the 10th president of the Victim HH Association, became a public official in the position of the president of the Association. On November 11, 2010, the person who is elected as the act of the president of the Association in a temporary immigration society held on November 11, 201 and is in charge of overall management of the affairs of the Association. Defendant B is a person in charge of assisting the duties of the president of the Association from around November 201, 201 to the act of the secretary general of

The victim association decided that the representatives of the association supporting Nonindicted J should have non-Confidenced the defendant A at the 101 plenary meeting on January 11, 201, and that the non-indicted J should be elected as the temporary meeting on January 11, 201. At around 16:30 on the same day, more than 150 service employees, etc., and it continued to occupy the association building as the victim association building located in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

On January 13, 2011, the Defendants attempted to enter the above association building with 50 service personnel and 30 service personnel, but failed to occupy the above association building. On February 5, 2011, the Defendants entered the association building again with 30 service personnel and moved into the association building again. In the process, the Defendants committed a violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc., Deadly Weapons, etc.).

As a result, the Defendants filed a request for a warrant of detention against the Defendants and received an investigation from the investigative agency, the Defendants were willing to pay the costs of the lawsuit, such as the attorney fees for their criminal cases, to the Association’s expenses, and the Defendants A instructed the Defendants B to do so, and the Defendants B to do so.