1. The Defendant’s KRW 3,405,780 as well as the annual rate from June 21, 2014 to January 15, 2015 to the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

(a) 1) Business approval and public announcement: A public announcement of project approval (B) 2: Defendant on March 21, 201, publicly notified by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs C, and the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on August 12, 201;

B. Subject to expropriation by the Central Land Tribunal on February 22, 2013: The land subject to expropriation by the Central Land Tribunal on February 22, 2013: Elution 52 square meters in light of the Plaintiff’s name, F 18 square meters in size, G 243 square meters in G 243 square meters, H 63 square meters in size (hereinafter “this case’s land”), and each land refers to the lot number only.

(3) Compensation for losses: Total sum of KRW 823,065,170 (compensation for the instant land KRW 613,252,720) on April 17, 2013, the Defendant paid KRW 823,065,170 to the Plaintiff on April 17, 2013.

C. On November 21, 2013, the Central Land Tribunal rendered an objection against the Defendant on January 4, 2014, the Defendant paid KRW 5,376,670, including the increased amount of compensation for G land and H land among the instant land, as indicated in the following table, to the Plaintiff.

1) The land in this case is located in the neighboring farmland zone where farmland, such as farming houses, electricity houses and paddy fields, and small-scale neighborhood living facilities, etc. are mixed with each other, and as a matter of course, the land in this case is generally located in the neighboring farmland zone, and the land in this case is flat, such as neighboring land, and the traffic condition is unlimited, and the land in this case constitutes a natural green area. 2) G land and H land are currently being used as a parking lot site.

3) As to the instant land, the amount of compensation recognized in the adjudication on expropriation (hereinafter “amount of adjudication on expropriation”) is deemed to be the amount of compensation.

(1) The expert witness I of this Court (hereinafter referred to as "court expert witness") and

The amount of compensation recognized as a result of the commission of appraisal on the land category is as follows. The amount of compensation recognized as a result of the commission of appraisal on the land category is as follows: (a) the amount of appraisal by the court (cost) equivalent to the amount of the adjudication of expropriation (cost) by the area of the subject land category (cost); (b) the amount of appraisal by the court (cost) shall be 100,806,160,160 100,674,670,670,670, 100,677, 100,677,200, 11828,752,440, 440, 228,459, 800, 228,459, 800 G and H land (if the subject land is a return, 24325,286,510,288.