1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Business approval and public notice - Business name - Project approval and public notice - Project approval of an urban planning facility project (sports park development project): Defendant: B publicly notice of February 9, 2015; and C public notice of Tae-si on December 16, 2015;

B. On December 23, 2011, the Gyeonggi-do Local Land Tribunal’s ruling of expropriation and the ruling of objection (hereinafter collectively referred to as “instant ruling”) dated March 23, 2017 by the Central Land Tribunal (hereinafter collectively referred to as “each of the above rulings”) - Subject to expropriation: The land subject to expropriation was divided into G land on December 23, 2011 into KRW 3,498 square meters in the wife population D, E/ 313 square meters in the E/ 313 square meters in the F/ 949 square meters (hereinafter referred to as “instant land”; and the land is specified as the parcel number when referring to the individual land) in G land; E land in the H land; and F land in the I land.

- From the starting date of expropriation: on April 14, 2016, the indemnity amount of KRW 3,498 square meters (won) 3,493,500 m294,563,50 m272,50 m26,630 m26,50 m274,274,50 E 313 m272,50 m272,50 m275,887,50 m200 m28,50 m25,00 m27,0013,60 m27,000 m27,000 m27,000 m27,500 m27,50 m27,605 m27,067,000 m27,000 m26,307,57,0636,000 m20

2. Assertion and determination

A. Part of the Plaintiff’s assertion is a land that is incorporated into a river area and used as a river due to the execution of a project, such as J bank Corporation, which is a past public project performed by the Defendant, and is classified into a non-paid land as prescribed by Article 25(1) of the Enforcement Rule of the Act on Acquisition of and Compensation for Land, etc. for Public Works Projects (hereinafter “Land Compensation Act”).