Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

On October 10, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor at the Incheon District Court for fraud, etc., and the judgment became final and conclusive on January 31, 2013.

1. On July 30, 2012, the Defendant interfered with business: (a) around 19:30 on July 30, 2012, the Defendant, within the E operated by the Victim D (28 years of age) located in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Handphone fee, “Ig, spule,” and brue and pule pule pule pule pule, even though the victim avoided it, continuously obstructed the Defendant’s legitimate business affairs over approximately 20 minutes of bit, and interfered with the Defendant’s legitimate business affairs.

2. On July 30, 2012, the Defendant of the obstruction of performance of official duties: (a) received 112 report from a police officer, who called out after having been reported that the junator fright was frighted within the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Namdong-gu C, and received 112 report that the junator fright was frighted; (b) without any justifiable reason, “Y fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright, etc.;

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the police officer's legitimate performance of official duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police statement concerning G and D;

1. Previous convictions: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of defendant's legal statement;

1. Relevant Articles 314(1) and 136(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of applicable Articles on criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of fines;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. As to the Defendant’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the Defendant met at the time of committing each of the instant crimes.