logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2016.04.20 2016고단486
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Larceny;

A. On July 18, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 00:48, in the Defendant’s residence located in Sistitu City C; and (b) the victim D (M, 45 years old) who was under his/her control was stolen by creshing the victim’s cresh; (c) one credit card of the victim’s U.S. bank located in the victim’s wall walled.

B. On August 22, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 01:00, at the above Defendant’s residence; (b) on August 22, 2015, the said victim lockedd the victim by taking advantage of cresh and cresh the victim’s credit card owned by the victim.

2. Violation of Acts in financial business specializing in larceny and credit finance;

A. On July 18, 2015, around 00:48, the Defendant: (a) entered the net cash withdrawal period at F convenience stores E, E, in a cash withdrawal period; (b) entered a password obtained by inserting the credit card owned by the stolen victim into the cash withdrawal period; and (c) withdrawn KRW 700,000 in cash with cash services (credit card short-term loans) and stolen it.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the above money and used the stolen credit card.

B. On August 22, 2015, around 01:53, the Defendant: (a) entered the net cash withdrawal machine at the H convenience store located in G in Silung-si; (b) inserted the credit card owned by the victim into the cash withdrawal machine; (c) inserted the password obtained by an influence method after inserting the credit card owned by the victim into the cash withdrawal machine; and (d) withdrawn KRW 1,200,000 in cash with the cash services (credit card short-term loans) and stolen it.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the above money and used the stolen credit card.

3. On January 19, 2016, the Defendant violated the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc.: (a) around 02:17, the victim’s cell phone using the Kakakao Stockholm Flux; and (b) the victim’s cell phone using the Kakao Stockholm Flux; (c) however, the Defendant is not aware of the fact that the Defendant’s cell phone was in the Kao Blux; (d) but, at present, the Defendant

Ner all males sent a message stating "Isn't have to do so," and on February 6, 2016 from that time.

arrow