(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.01.08 2014누56330

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.01.08 2014누56330

지체된납본증명서발급및정당한보상거부처분취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, citing this case, is the same as the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except in the following cases, and thus, it shall be quoted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Part 2 of the Judgment of the first instance court 6th "B" is added to "(the name of in-house director G of the representative of the plaintiff)."

B. On the second 10th 2nd 10th 10th 2nd 2nd 2nd 10, “the Library Act” is followed by “Article 20(1) of the Library Act, Article 13 of the former Enforcement Decree of the Library Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 25549, Aug. 12, 2014); Article 8 of the former Enforcement Rule of the Library Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 182, Sep. 26, 2014).”

(c)on 2, 15 pages 15 of the first instance judgment, the “written claim for book delivery and book delivery compensation” is raised as “library material delivery and written claim for compensation”;

The first instance court's decision 3 pages 1, " November 29, 2013" shall be deemed to be " December 13, 2013."

(e) 3 pages 1, 2, 3, 3, 5, 5, 5, and 5,000,000.

On December 18, 2013, the Defendant issued the Plaintiff a certificate of deposit in respect of the total amount of eight books of this case presented to the Plaintiff pursuant to Article 20(3) of the Library Act, and notified the Plaintiff that the pertinent amount of compensation for the said copies is KRW 102,320 (=25,580 compensation per one right x four rights) and that the amount exceeding the amount of compensation claimed by the Plaintiff should not be compensated (hereinafter the above certificate of deposit and the refusal of payment exceeding KRW 102,320 out of the compensation claimed by the Plaintiff is “the instant disposition”).

(i) "";

(f) by inserting 19 pages 3 of the first instance judgment, the phrase “a damaged” shall be added “in violation of Article 4, etc. of the Administrative Procedures Act.”

(g) by inserting 19 pages 3, 19, the following shall be added:

Article 5 of the Administrative Procedures Act shall specify and clarify the contents of the administrative action taken by an administrative agency.

The disposition of this case is stipulated as the disposition of this case.

참조조문

유사 판례

-서울고등법원 2015.10.15 2015누38971

-서울고등법원 2018.07.20 2017누83425

-서울고등법원 2016.07.13 2015누51844

-서울고등법원 2016.03.16 2015누42901

-서울고등법원 2014.01.16 2013누23968