logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.07.13 2015누51844
산재보험급여액등징수처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the judgment of the court of first instance except for adding and adding some of the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, it is accepted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2.7. The following shall be added to the two pages:

【Plaintiff and D did not prepare a labor contract in writing, but the Plaintiff paid D 1,70,000 won as monthly pay, and KRW 1,60,000 as of June 18, 2013, respectively, to D 14. Then, “The Plaintiff submitted a report on the establishment of the industrial accident insurance relationship to the head of the regional headquarters of the Korea Workers’ Compensation and Welfare Service only on June 10, 2013.”

Two pages (based on recognition) shall be raised in the column by “Nos. 4 and 6” with “Nos. 4 through 9.”

3. 11. The following is added to “The entry and entry of “B No. 13”, and the term “this Court” is changed to “the first instance court”.

3. 3. 14. The testimony of a witness H of the trial shall be added next to the “each entry”.

3.On the 14th page, the following shall be added:

【The Plaintiff, the president of the restaurant of 20 square meters south and ice part of the Plaintiff’s Kabter and ice part, the Plaintiff’s East H, the fact that D was in exclusive charge of ice ice ice ice ice ice, and D was going to go through ice ice on June 6, 2013 to H who worked at the kitchen on the same day, and D was unable to benefit from medical insurance because D was going to go through ice ice in E Hospital with the Plaintiff on the same day. Accordingly, D cannot receive benefit from medical insurance, and the Plaintiff was going to go to go into the house of D’s office. The Plaintiff’s 4th 5th eth 7th 7th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 5th 4th 5th 4th 5th 4th 5th 5th 4th 5th 4th 5th 4th 4th 5th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4.

In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is justifiable.

The plaintiff's appeal is filed.

arrow