logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.05.04 2016구합416
토지수용보상금증액
Text

1. The plaintiff (appointed)'s claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the plaintiff (appointed party).

Reasons

Approval and Public Notice of Project Approval - Project Name: C Project (former D Project; hereinafter referred to as the “instant Project”): Defendant - Public Notice: The Central Land Expropriation Committee announced on March 7, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as the “Adjudication on Expropriation”) by March 26, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as the “Adjudication on Expropriation”) - Subject to Expropriation: The following (The detailed statement of compensation) is the column of land subject to Expropriation:

(Plaintiffs, F, G, H as co-inheritors of network I jointly inherited the instant land subject to expropriation. The Defendant acquired co-inheritors’ share in the instant land subject to expropriation from the remaining co-inheritors, other than Plaintiff and Selected B. The date of expropriation begins: the amount of compensation: May 19, 2015: Plaintiff 5,562,00 won; B83,343,010 won (detailed details are as follows: hereinafter referred to as “compensation on expropriation”) - An appraisal corporation: The Pacific Appraisal Corporation; one of 30,00,000, 1636, B, 111, B, 366, 210, B, 348, 166, B, B, 148, 167, B, and 156, B, and 250,000 shares prior to the expropriation of the land subject to expropriation, Plaintiff 2,3636,210,210, B,349, and 3271,716,7/7,

C. The Central Land Tribunal rendered an objection on January 21, 2016 (hereinafter “instant objection”) - The Plaintiff and Appointed B’s objection that compensates for the portion of “road” in the area of 1,775 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) prior to Seocheon-gun, Seocheon-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, and increases compensation for losses, shall be dismissed. - An appraisal corporation: The Korea Appraisal Board, the Korea Joint Appraisal Board, and the Korea Joint Appraisal Board (which is based on recognition), did not dispute any entry in the items of subparagraphs 1 through 3, and the purport of the entire pleadings, and the Plaintiff’s assertion as to the purport of judgment.

arrow