1. The Defendants are jointly and severally liable to the rest of the Plaintiffs, other than Plaintiffs C, F, and N, in the separate sheet of compensation.

1. Details of ruling;

A. Business Name: O development project (hereinafter “instant project”): The Defendants - Notice: P on October 15, 2010; Q on November 30, 2012; and R R Public Notice of Chungcheongbuk-do on June 7, 2013;

(b) Decision on expropriation made on November 26, 2013 by the Chungcheongbuk-do Regional Land Tribunal - The date of commencement of expropriation: January 25, 2014 - Land specified in the attached Form of Compensation:

(hereinafter referred to as “land subject to expropriation of this case”) - Compensation: The amount shall be calculated as the same as the indicated in the “land subject to expropriation” column in attached Form 3, which derives from the arithmetic mean of each appraisal result of appraisal by appraisal corporations and by appraisal corporations, one stock company

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on February 26, 2015 - The content of the ruling: Based on the arithmetic mean of each appraisal result of the appraisal corporation for the corporation, the corporation for the appraisal of sight appraisal corporations, and the appraisal corporation for the compensation list in the annexed sheet, the “interest amount” should be determined as indicated in the annexed sheet.

(d) The result of the court’s entrustment of appraisal - Compensation: The phrase “court appraisal amount” in the attached Form No. 1 shall be indicated.

- An appraiser: Being without a dispute (based on recognition) by S(S)(S)(S)(hereinafter “court appraiser”); entry of Gap(s) 1, 2, and Eul(s) 1 through 3(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(s)(

2. The main point of the plaintiffs' assertion is that the compensation for the land subject to expropriation of this case reflects the wrong appraisal result, such as not reflecting the transaction examples and the compensation preference of neighboring similar land, and it is remarkably lower than the market price.

Therefore, the defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay the plaintiffs the reasonable compensation for the land subject to expropriation of this case, the difference between the compensation and the damages for delay as stipulated in the adjudication of expropriation or objection.

3. Determination

(a) Expropriations;