1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. Plaintiff A is the father of the deceased on November 21, 201 (hereinafter “the deceased”). Plaintiff B is the mother of the deceased, and Plaintiff C is the deceased’s punishment.

The defendant is a company whose main business is the design, construction and supervision of information and communications facilities.

B. On March 8, 2010, the Deceased entered into an employment contract with the Defendant and was dispatched from March 23, 2010 to February 9, 201, while serving in the Defendant’s overseas business division, and was temporarily dispatched to Africa and then dispatched again on September 15, 201.

C. On October 12, 201, the Deceased, who is a F-type B infection, was in the process of investigating, supervising, and supervising the site of the construction of telecommunications cables laid underground in his/her jurisdiction on October 12, 201, he/she was hospitalized in the KINGFAAL HOSPAL emergency room, and was treated as a result of an abnormal function based on the multi-pactination.

On October 19, 2011, the deceased returned to Korea and died on November 21, 201, while hospitalized in a hospital affiliated with the Reduced University and received treatment.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without a partial dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 5, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Judgment on the plaintiffs' assertion

A. Under an employment contract with the deceased, the Defendant asserts that the Defendant has a duty to take necessary measures, such as improving human and physical environment, so that the deceased, who is an employee, does not harm his/her life, body, and health in the course of providing his/her labor. The Defendant has a duty to maintain and promote the safety and health of the deceased who is an employee under the Occupational Safety and Health Act and the Labor Standards Act, while maintaining and improving the safety and health of the deceased, and to prevent the aggravation

Nevertheless, the defendant has dispatched the deceased for a long time to Aflacar ary, which is a extreme heat area, and has a high risk of liver cancer generation, and has the deceased stay there.