logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2015.12.23 2013가단47036
손해배상(기)
Text

1. As to the Plaintiff B’s KRW 20,704,307, Plaintiff C, D, and E, respectively, and each amount of KRW 13,802,871 on January 15, 2012.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Defendant is a doctor to establish and operate “G hospital” in the size of 49 sickbeds specializing in the hospitalized treatment of mentally and patients, such as alcohol addicts, elderly persons with dementia, and developmental disorders.

B. The deceased A (hereinafter “the deceased”) was under pharmacologic treatment with normal high blood pressure and prefacinite cancer, and was physically healthy except for those subject to pharmacologic treatment. While the scinite’s seriousness was normal, since September 201, the scinite was caused by the symptoms of symptoms due to severe dementia, and the family was forced to hospitalized the deceased on November 28, 201 to the Defendant’s hospital.

C. At around 06:00 on January 15, 2012, the Deceased was hospitalized at the Defendant’s hospital and transferred to the I Hospital.

I Hospital's doctor diagnosed the Deceased as "over-the-counter cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral Sponsor", and performed an urgent astronomical mar and hactical humphal

After that, the Deceased was hospitalized for a long time in various medical institutions, such as I Hospital, but did not recover from the health. In the course of long-term hospitalized treatment, the Deceased died during the period of hospitalization at J General Hospital on May 26, 2014.

The main doctor diagnosed the deceased as a chronic pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary disease, the middle pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary disease, and the prior private person.

E. The deceased’s property rights and duties are the deceased’s spouse’s Plaintiff C, D, and E: 2: 2: 2: 2: 2.

[Reasons for Recognition] Gap's Evidence Nos. 1, 2, 8, 9, 10, 13, Eul's Evidence No. 1, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. The gist of the plaintiffs' assertion (i.e., an accident or accident during which the deceased was hospitalized at the defendant's hospital, which led to cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral Sp

Doshed the deceased had brain surgery at the I Hospital and received long-term preservation treatment at several medical institutions.

arrow