1. The Defendant’s KRW 124,912,861 as well as the Plaintiff’s KRW 6% per annum from February 24, 2015 to November 9, 2016.

Basic Facts

A. The plaintiff is a person engaged in aggregate work using a scambling machine, and the defendant is a company engaged in wholesale and retail business of aggregate.

B. The Plaintiff was awarded a contract with the Defendant for a construction project for cutting the aggregate, and during the period from the second half of 2006 to the year 2010, the Plaintiff engaged in the work of digging up the soil before cutting the aggregate by using the refratator owned by the Plaintiff in the field of Jeonju-si, Jeonbuk-gun, Jeonbuk-gun, and Jeonbuk-gun, Jeonbuk-gun, Jeonbuk-gun.

(1) 206. 2. 2. 47,00,000,000 2. 2. 42,000,000 42,000,000 42,000,200 42,000,00 46,200,00 2. 2. 19,500,000 1,000,000 19,50,000, 950,000 21,450, 450,000 2. 8,0040, 205,000, 2040,005,000 20,50,000 20,50,000,000 20,50,000,000 2,50,005,0050, 2005

C. The details reported by the Plaintiff and the Defendant as the value of supply for the transactions between the two parties in the Jeonju Tax Office are as follows.

From October 4, 2006 to February 13, 2012, the Defendant paid KRW 138,230,000 to the Plaintiff for construction work during the said period, and paid KRW 168,437,139 to the Plaintiff for the installment of KRW 30,207,139.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap's 1, 2, 3, 3, and evidence of this court's tax information replys to the Director of the Jeonju District Tax Office, and judgment as to the grounds for appeal as a whole.

A. Comprehensively taking account of the Defendant’s above recognition of the construction price obligations, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff KRW 126,912,861, and damages for delay, calculated by deducting KRW 168,437,139, which have already been repaid by the Plaintiff from KRW 295,350,00 for the period from the second half of 206 to 2010, barring any special circumstances.

B. The Defendant’s argument is the total monthly construction cost.