logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2015.01.09 2014구합12116
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

On June 14, 2005, the Plaintiff, an alien of the nationality of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan (hereinafter referred to as "Pakic Republic of Pakistan"), staying in the capacity of non-professional employment (H-9) and repeated entry and departure, and the expiration date of the period of stay (e.g., July 5, 201), applied for refugee status to the Defendant on July 20, 201.

On January 9, 2013, the Defendant issued a disposition for non-recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on the ground that there was no “probably-founded fear of persecution” (see Article 2 subparag. 3 of the Immigration Control Act (amended by Act No. 11298, Feb. 10, 2012), Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees, and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees).

The Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on February 22, 2013, but was dismissed on April 11, 2014.

[Based on the recognition, the Plaintiff’s assertion as to the legitimacy of the disposition of the instant case as to Gap’s evidence Nos. 1, 2, and Eul’s evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 1, and 2, and the purport of the entire pleadings was born and cultivated in Pakistan’s punja.

The plaintiff and the family members of the plaintiff were Muslimism, and the plaintiff and the family were changed into Islamic Sus of Asia around January 201.

The dispute is very serious between the hh-e-Sabaistan (hereinafter referred to as the "SP") and the Islamic bridge. As the plaintiff and the plaintiff's family members move into Islamic bridge, the members of the Sim-Sabab (SP), an armed organization for the Islamic bridge, were murdered by the plaintiff's dynamics.

Plaintiff

In addition, in case of returning to Pakistan, there is a threat of being killed from Islamic Islamic groups on the grounds of dog species.

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not recognize the Plaintiff as a refugee, so the instant disposition should be revoked in an unlawful manner.

It shall be as shown in the attached Form of the relevant statutes.

In fact, Pakistan is 96% of the population is Islamic believers, and it is 75% of the Islamic believers.

arrow