(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2013.03.20 2013고단79

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2013.03.20 2013고단79

공갈미수등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 2, 2012, the Defendant became aware of the victim B (the age of 21) on the sail line, which is a smartphone, in the middle of 2012.

1. On December 26, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 10:55, the Defendant: (b) was driving the victim on the CNVS CNS C, and was driving the victim on the CNS Pene, and was in the vicinity of the CNS, Kim Jong-gun, the Jeonju-Gun, in the vicinity of the CNE Kim Jong-do public morals; and (c) on the ground that the Defendant refused the agreement, “one year, whether the agreement would not be made, or if the agreement would be made; and (d) considered the victim’s inside part of the C at least two weeks of the victim’s injury to the face, the impairment of the cco’s character, and the injury to the string.

2. On December 26, 2012, the Defendant: (a) notified the frighter of drinking, who suffered from an injury, of the phone number (D) of the lending company at around 10:58; (b) forcedly called the lending company to take phone; and (c) discovered documents necessary for lending; (d) around 11:20 minutes of the same day, the Defendant: (a) took the victim back at the Gunsan-si, Gunsan Cooperative, Seosan-si, Gunsan Islands; (b) made the victim open a passbook necessary for lending; (c) frighted the victim; (d) frighted the victim; (d) frighted the victim; and (e) frighted the victim; and (d) requested the frighter to make the head of the passbook; and (e) frighted the victim’s clothes and debt; and (e) frighted the victim’s fright the victim’s body and debt; and (d) later, (e) f) f) frighted.

As a result, the Defendant received loans equivalent to KRW 30 million from the victim to withdraw them, but the employees of the Nonghyup who received help from the victim did not report it to the police and did not commit an attempted crime.

b)a summary of the evidence;

유사 판례

-전주지방법원 군산지원 2019.10.04 2018고단1528

-광주지방법원 2012.10.09 2011고단6300

-창원지방법원 마산지원 2016.07.12 2016고단494

-부산지방법원 2020.01.08 2019고단4449

-제주지방법원 2019.05.16 2018고단1443