logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2015.05.13 2015고단372
폭행등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 23:40 on December 23, 2014, the Defendant assaulted the victim by putting the victim’s bridge on the Defendant’s bridge to cross up the victim’s bridge in order to protect the victim’s C(23 years of age) and the driver’s bridge due to the traffic problems between the victim and the vehicle in the vicinity of Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu B.

2. Forgery of private documents and the display of private documents;

A. On December 24, 2014, around 00:10 on December 24, 2014, the Defendant: (a) requested the E District E District F to affix a signature on a voluntary action letter from E District F, which is located in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si, to affix a seal; (b) the Defendant was informed that he was requested by police officers to voluntarily act at the same time and place; (c) he was able to refuse it; and (d) was able to freely withdraw at any time and at any time; and (d) confirmed that he voluntarily responded to the voluntary action.”

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a letter of voluntary written consent, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

B. The Defendant, at the same time and place as the above paragraph (a) above, issued a forged voluntary behavior letter to F, as if it were a document, and exercised it.

3. Private signature, forgery, and uttering of a false investigation or signature;

A. On December 24, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 03:40 on December 24, 2014, under the investigation of the interrogation of a suspect as a suspected case, such as assault, etc. from a slope H belonging to the said police station; (b) the Defendant was placed in the office of the said police station and the two team office; (c) as if he were G; and (d) after completing the investigation, indicated “G” in the “person who made a statement” column of the interrogation protocol of a suspect as “G” and marked the Defendant’s seal.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged the signature of G with private signature for the purpose of exercising the right.

(b).

arrow