logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.10.26 2016나39698
구상금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for the case as stated in paragraph (2) (Articles 3, 16, and 14 of the judgment of the first instance). Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Parts to be dried;

A. On the third page of the judgment of the court of first instance, Defendant D’s “Defendant D” in the first instance trial is deemed to be “Co-Defendant D of the first instance trial (hereinafter “D”).

B. On the 3rd page of the judgment of the court of first instance, the term “.......” in the 19th instance judgment is respectively dismissed as “the December 18, 2003,” and “the Defendant Company A (hereinafter “Defendant Company”)” as “A Codefendant A (hereinafter “A”) of the first instance court.”

C. On December 17, 2004, the first instance judgment No. 4, 201, written “No. 17, 2014,” as “No. 17, 2004.”

The third part of the judgment of the court of first instance is " April 26, 201" as " April 26, 2001."

E. On April 25, 2012, the first instance court’s decision No. 4, 2012, stated “No. 25, 2012” as “ April 25, 2002,” and “ April 25, 2014,” respectively, shall be deemed “ April 25, 2004.”

F. On the fourth page of the judgment of the court of first instance, Defendant B and C shall be deemed to be Defendant B and C in the first instance trial.

G. On the 5th page of the first instance judgment, the 5th page “instant real estate” is regarded as “the instant real estate”.

H. On the 5th sentence of the first instance judgment, the first instance court’s 7th sentence “906” shall be deemed to be “806.”

I. On the 6th day of the first instance judgment, the Defendant M&A is deemed to be “D”.

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant is dismissed as it is without merit. Among the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow