logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.03.11 2019나50016
예금
Text

1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the plaintiff, which orders payment below, shall be revoked.

The defendant.

Reasons

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the changed part as “3. In other words,” and the changed part as “3.....................

2. Parts in height:

A. During the second half of the judgment of the court of first instance, “the Plaintiff is the Defendant from February 20, 2004 to January 19, 201,” and “the Plaintiff is the Defendant from February 20, 2004 to January 19, 201.”

B. Each Plaintiff’s “Plaintiff” in the third page 3 and 14 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed to be the Defendant.

C. On the third page 17 of the judgment of the court of first instance, “Plaintiff” in relation to the above loan is deemed to be “Plaintiff” as “Defendant in relation to the above loan.”

On the fourth and thirteen pages of the judgment of the first instance, each "Defendant" shall be raised to "Plaintiff".

E. On the fourth 16th tier of the first instance judgment, the phrase “58,418,944 won” shall be read as “58,418,944 won”.

F. Under the fifth page of the judgment of the first instance court, “the Plaintiff was damaged to the Defendant” during the sixth sentence.

G. Once the judgment of the court of first instance is in 6, the phrase “written confirmation of non-performance” shall be read as “written confirmation of non-performance.”

H. The first part of the seventh part of the judgment of the court of first instance is deemed to be null and void.

I. On the 8th part of the judgment of the first instance, “The offset disposition by the defendant does not have the effect of offset on the ground of the absence of the automatic claim,” and “the offset disposition by the defendant does not have the effect on the ground of the absence of the automatic claim,” in the 9th part, “a claim with the bond” and “the defendant” in the 4th part below are respectively dismissed.

3. A modified portion of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be subject to the following alteration from 10 pages 6 to 11, 9 (including the judgment on the additional assertion made by the defendant in this court). The plaintiff who was offset on August 23, 2013 by set-off on August 23, 2013.

arrow