logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2014.03.25 2013고단4193
상해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

At around 14:00 on September 15, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 14:00, at C Apartment 1301, the Defendant had been working in the guard room, and (b) around 14:00, the victim D who had been working in the guard room, and (c) before being aware that the Defendant had been subjected to a disposition of non-guilty suspicion by assaulting the victim; (b) he was flading the victim's entrance into the guard room once due to drinking, and followed the victim who left the guard room, and followed the victim to walk out the guard room for about 4 weeks, and followed the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made D in the second trial records;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the accused by the prosecution (including D parts concerning the statement);

1. E statements;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs taken on top of the body;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 257 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. The Defendant and his defense counsel’s assertion on the assertion of the Defendant and his defense counsel under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence of execution of the Criminal Act (a favorable circumstances among the reasons for sentencing as follows) asserts that while the Defendant had a verbal dispute with the victim, the victim was pushed the Defendant, and the Defendant was in contact with the victim’s back, and the occurrence of the victim’s back to the Defendant could have contacted the victim’s back, but the victim’s back to the back to the Defendant could not have ever s

In other words, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence mentioned above are: (a) the victim consistently enters the investigative agency to this court; (b) when the defendant enters the guard room and took one time out of the guard room; and (c) the victim made a statement that the victim's victim's back-to-faceh and back-to-faceh were the victim's back-to-faceh and back-down at the time of making the second police interrogation protocol; (d) however, the victim stated that the statement, other statement, the police suspect examination protocol, the prosecution examination protocol, and the second trial date of this case was two times the back-to-date.

arrow