logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.11.30 2017고정1648
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant: (a) at around March 19, 2016, at an influent place; (b) the victim C and the victim’s mother known to be a female in E, who worked in E, was born to the father, and (c) had not been born to the victim; (b) had access to D with E, “E”; and (c) had re-influened the news article’s news article’s news article’s news article’s news article’s news article’s text in E, with a pair of 1,000 f,000 f,000 f,000 f,000 f,00 f,00 f,00 f,00 f, which was born to E, thereby impairing the victim’s reputation through the information and communications network from 10 days to 20 days to 10 days to 10 days to 20 days to 10 days to 20 days after the victim’s news statement.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police in relation to G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes 10 (E) to suspects 10 (E) by cutting down the data to run a defamation sign, a H-only document, a student-only certificate, a certificate of recognition of the completion of the course, a screen of comments on comments, and a screen of comments on comments;

1. Article 70 (2) of the Act on Promotion of Utilization of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. for Criminal Facts and the Punishment Therefor;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The summary of the Defendant’s argument on the assertion of the Defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order is not a false fact, but a false fact was not known, and there was no purpose of defamation.

The fact that constitutes the elements of the crime charged in the trademark criminal trial is the prosecutor who bears the burden of proof, whether it is a subjective requirement or an objective requirement, and the promotion of use of information and communications networks and information protection.

arrow