A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2016. 5. 31. 16:58 경 대구 북구 C 104동 107호 피고인의 집에서, ‘D’ 라는 네이버 인터넷 기사를 보고 『E 네 가족들은 특히 누나가 법무법인 F에서 일하는 G 씨라고 하던데 책임지고 쟤 출소 하면 방안에 쳐 박아 두고 집 밖으로 나오지 못하게 해 라 』라고 인터넷 댓 글을 게재하고, 같은 날 17:01 경 같은 장소에서『 그리고 E 네 가족들은 피해자 가족에게 평생 속죄하며 살길 양심이 있다면 말 야 』라고 인터넷 댓 글을 게재하였다.

As a result, the Defendant indicated the “the occupation, workplace, and name of the victim G” through the Internet comments, which are information and communications networks that many unspecified people peruse, and damaged the honor of the victim for the purpose of slandering by making the victim feel well and live while committing a crime because the victim is a family member of H’s suspect E.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. A written petition;

1. Screenings to close the Face-to-face North Korea;

1. The screen by taking respective comments on the screen;

1. Application of each investigation report (hereinafter “I”) document attached to a summary of the broadcast content, and submission of Niberer Information Data Data

1. Article 70 (1) of the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, etc., of Criminal Facts;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence is that the Defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by means of information and communications networks for the purpose of slandering the victim, and posting Internet comments to allow many and unspecified persons to view the victim, thereby infringing the victim’s reputation, and failing to reach an smooth agreement with the victim, etc. are disadvantageous to the Defendant.

However, it is reasonable to consider the circumstances that the Defendant posted comments on the Internet in the process of making excessive appraisal of the Internet articles of this case while gaining an excessive appraisal.