logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.05.08 2014고단1133
사서명위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 6, 2014, the Defendant in violation of the Resident Registration Act was arrested as a flagrant offender suspected of assaulting C on February 6, 2014, and was transferred to E district unit in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Area E district in Seocho-gu, Seoul. After responding to the person who was requested by F to present his/her resident registration number to verify his/her identity, who is his/her model G resident registration number, and had the said F in trust prepare a letter of arrest of a flagrant offender with the personal information of the said G, and used the said G resident registration number as above in the course of interrogation.

Accordingly, the defendant used another person's resident registration number unlawfully.

2. The Defendant: (a) arrested a flagrant offender as a flagrant offender on the date and time, at the place, as described in paragraph (1); (b) presented a letter of arrest of a flagrant offender prepared in the name of the said G; and (c) stated in the confirmation column as “G” as if he was a signature of G; (b) around 10:10 on the same day, the slope I affiliated with the said E zone presented the protocol of interrogation prepared in the name of the said G; and (c) stated in the statement column as “G” as if he was a signature of G, and signed next thereto.

Accordingly, the defendant has forged the signature of the other party for the purpose of exercising the right.

3. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph (2), submitted the signature of each forged G name, as described in paragraph (2), to the F of the circumstances belonging to the E Zone and the assistant I, who knew of the forgery, as if it were duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. Application of current Acts and subordinate statutes to arrest flagrant offenders, written confirmation, and police suspect interrogation protocol under G;

1. Article 239 (1) and (2) of the Criminal Act, Article 37 subparagraph 10 of the Resident Registration Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Order of community service;

arrow