The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than three years and nine months.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. misunderstanding of facts 1) Although the Defendant was at the time of May 18, 2018, when he/she covered the plate and applied it to the D, the Defendant merely micked with the plate, and the Defendant did not go to the time when he/she micked or damaged. 2) At the time of May 18, 2018, the Defendant was at the time when he/she micked with G, the Defendant did not take part in the body part of the victim’s left shoulder and the bones of the left side. However, the Defendant was at the time when he/she micked with the victim’s finger or kicked with the victim’s hair by kicking the victim’s finger or with his/her left hand, and did not take part in the body part of the victim’s left shoulder and the left bones.

3) On June 21, 2018, the Defendant filed a report on 119 on June 21, 2018 because he/she was living together with AX’s condition, but thereafter, since the AX’s condition was improved and the 119 first aid unit was not in an emergency situation to enter the place of reporting the new outbreak, thereby entering the Defendant’s house does not constitute legitimate performance of official duties. Meanwhile, at the same time, the Defendant only fell under the Defendant’s minor liability, not the floor of the K, but rather the floor of the lele, and thus, he/she suffered injury that requires two weeks’ medical treatment. (b) The lower court’s sentence of unfair sentencing (limited to imprisonment with labor for a maximum of four years) is unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. An ex officio determination prosecutor changes the phrase “injury” from among the names of the crimes in the case of 2018 high-class 3611 of the judgment of the court below, to delete Article 257(1) of the applicable provisions of the Act (the Criminal Act), to delete “injury” in the facts charged, and to delete “injury” in Article 257(2) of the Act, and at the same time, the Defendant interfered with emergency medical services by exercising violence to fire fighters who called up at the same time interfered with the legitimate performance of duties, and at the same time interfered with emergency medical services by using violence to the fire fighters who called up at the same time, and at the same time interfered with emergency medical services by using violence to the fire fighters who need approximately two weeks of treatment of the reported case.”