logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.05.21 2014가단5041363
구상금
Text

1. The Defendants jointly committed against the Plaintiff KRW 2,627,973,259 and KRW 1,00,000,000 among them, from July 31, 2013.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The party-related plaintiff is an insurance company that has established fire insurance business, etc. for its business purposes, and is an insurer that has concluded the following insurance contracts with the non-party E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter the above company "E" and the above factory "E factories". The defendant A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter the "Defendant Co., Ltd.") is the company that runs the business of manufacturing stie pumps, etc. from the above E-factory Kimpo-si's ground factory (hereinafter the "Defendant Co., Ltd.") that runs between the above E-factory and the second line road. The defendant B is the defendant B.

As seen in the foregoing paragraph, the Defendant Company entered into a contract with the Defendant Company and caused the instant fire accident on July 3, 2012, insurance period from July 3, 2012 to July 3, 2013, the date of the insurance contract for insurance types, factories fire insurance, etc.

B. (1) On May 21, 2013, the Defendant Company contracted the work of building the Defendant Company’s factory to Defendant B in KRW 35 million. (2) On June 9, 2013, Defendant B, pursuant to the said contract, performed Contact work among steel-line connection work to complete the slope of the said passage in the course of construction with concrete covering on the passage connecting the second floor of the production-Dong building in the Defendant Company’s factory and the commercial building having a warehouse.

3) On the right side of the place where Defendant B performed the contact work as above, there were a large number of strings of 2m in length and 4m in height in the Defendant Company’s factory. However, there were a fire that strings of strings of strings on the strings of 1 to 3m away from the site where the fire occurred during the contact work, and the fire that began in the Defendant Company’s factory as above.

arrow