(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2018.10.10 2018고단1056

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2018.10.10 2018고단1056

공용물건손상등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2] On December 12, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (Habitual Bodily Injury) at the Jeonju District Court on December 12, 2014, and the sentence was terminated on January 20, 2016. On May 11, 2016, the Jeonju District Court sentenced ten months to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury) at the Jeonju District Court and served in the military mountain prison on December 3, 2016. On March 10, 2017, the execution of the sentence was terminated. The Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for habitual assault, etc. at the original prison on January 17, 2018.

[Criminal facts]

1. The Defendant damaged public goods at the C main point in the Ysan-si B, the following: (a) reported 112 to the effect that “intoxic guests will take a bath, and need to take a view; and (b) requested a slope E from the Darsan Police Station D District Unit E, which called the Defendant, to leave the front seat of the F 112 patrol, a case for public goods.

On August 26, 2018, in the vicinity of H on August 26, 2018, the Defendant damaged the accompanying public goods so that the partitions of the patrol vehicle can take an amount equivalent to KRW 250,000,00,00,000, without any particular reason.

2. On August 26, 2018, the Defendant: (a) expressed to the said police officer that he was asked by the said police officer E to leave the patrol on the ground that the said police officer would be bad; (b) continued to be expelled from the said police officer, and (c) attempted to go back to the right arms of the said police officer, and (d) obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties on the part of the said police officer, by assaulting the above police officer’s left side bridge, such as a vehicle on the front side of the said police officer, and obstructing the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties on the duty of reporting 112 and on the duty of mobilization and security.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Each statement K and L;

1. Photographs (the Assistant E influence to the suspect);

참조조문

-폭력행위 등 처벌에 관한 법률

유사 판례

-전주지방법원 2017.06.21 2016고단1513

-전주지방법원 군산지원 2017.06.16 2017고단214

-전주지방법원 군산지원 2017.11.03 2016고단732

-수원지방법원 2018.02.20 2017고단7972

-청주지방법원 2017.11.02 2017고단1971