A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 16, 2017, the Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties at the entrance of 202 apartment premises of the 202-ro 32 Donsan-si, Donsan-si, Donsan-si, Donsan-si, 32 Donsan-si, and “the driver had inflicted violence and shock on the vehicle” at the site upon receiving 112 reports, and assaulted the said C’s chest and neck by hand to check the personal information and the details of the report.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

2. When the Defendant, at the time, at the same time and place as the preceding paragraph, was arrested as a flagrant offender and was arrested as a flagrant offender to board the D patrol vehicle, the Defendant damaged the goods used by public offices by making the said patrol vehicle wear the parts of the repair cost by walking the parts of the said patrol vehicle at several times.

3. On January 16, 2017, the Defendant was driven under the influence of alcohol by a police officer who was dispatched to the site after receiving a report of about 112 after driving a vehicle for EK7 vehicle at about 10 meters in front of the second apartment house located in the 32-ro B district unit of the Hasan Police Station located in the Hasan-si, the Donsan-si on January 16, 2017, when the Defendant was found to have driven a vehicle for EK7 in front of the second apartment house located in the Donsan-si, the Donsan-si. On the same day, the Defendant committed the crimes under Articles 1. 1. and 2.

There is a reasonable reason to determine a person, and it was demanded to respond to the measurement of drinking by inserting approximately 20 minutes of the alcohol measuring instrument from around the same day to around 01:32 of the same day.

Nevertheless, the Defendant refused to comply with a police officer’s request for alcohol testing without justifiable grounds by avoiding inserting the part of a drinking measuring instrument into a drinking measuring instrument.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Each police statement made to C and H;

1. On-site photographs;