A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

Punishment of the crime

On September 5, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective deadly weapon, etc.) at the Seoul Western District Court on September 5, 2013, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Seoul Western District Court on October 25, 2014.

1. The Defendant, who interfered with the business of the Victim D, found the victim’s name and in the G office operated by the victim D on September 5, 2016, the name and the name and the name and the name of the handicapped, including E, and the name and the name and the name of the handicapped, and the name and the name of the deceased, around 16:00 on September 5, 2016, and

H The collection of claims against H

the victim shall pay the victim the remaining money.

The money shall be paid promptly until the openings and the receipt of money are made.

I would like to find in the house.

It was difficult to avoid disturbance without going through the above office for about 30 minutes, such as continuing to take a bath, such as a large sound to the effect that “.......”

Accordingly, the Defendant conspiredd with E, etc. to interfere with the management of the victim's office.

2. Interference with the business of victims I;

A. At around 10:50 on September 7, 2016, the Defendant: (a) refused by the victim of the damage, on the grounds as stipulated in paragraph (1) at K Office operated by the injured party of the damage under paragraph (1) of the Daegu-gu Dong-gu, Daegu-dong-gu, 201, and 201, for the same reason, he did not go to the above place for about 40 to 50 minutes, such as: (b) he was unable to pay the money to the victim; (c) he did not go to the victim; (d) he received the money from the victim; (d) he did not go to the victim; (d) he did so.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the operation of the victim's office by force.

B. On September 7, 2016, the Defendant’s defect in driving a car to perform duties outside the parking lot prior to the above office around September 7, 2016, prevents the Defendant from driving the car after the said vehicle, or from driving the said car when he sits and sits. The Defendant is the victim of the vehicle on which the Defendant continued to board.