Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, the Defendants did not pay the fine.

Punishment of the crime

From April 7, 2017, the Defendants, together with C, engaged in demonstration, such as singing outside the E Anmopark entrance, located in both weeks, and the F, the vice-director of the Emopark management office, has stamped three copies of the banner photographed in front of the Emopark, and entered the office.

Accordingly, on April 7, 2017, the Defendants entered the E Mu Park Office around 15:00, and there should be any year from which they have taken photographs.

The same year, "a photograph is stamped", "a photograph is crossed out", and the victim G does not interfere with the business, "Apatch", "Apatch for whom the test was done", "Apatch for whom the test was made", and "Apatch or dpatch for which the test was made."

"A humping down from a disease," etc., Defendant A was able to avoid any disturbance, such as breaking the hand of the victim who taken the cell phone into the cell phone and breaking the cell phone.

As a result, the Defendants conspired and interfered with the victim's business of selling charnel houses by approximately 10 minutes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness G and F;

1. The defendants asserts to the effect that the business obstruction photographs [the defendants merely demanded to delete the pictures taken without permission by F, and did not interfere with the victim's business of selling a charnel house.]

However, the circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, namely, ① the Defendants were engaged in demonstration outside the office, and the F, the Vice Minister for the Management of the Memorial Park, took photographs, etc. under the direction of the victim; ② the Defendants entered the office; ② the F, showing the Defendant’s photograph to the Defendant A, was deleted, but the Defendants did not go from the office; and Defendant B did not take a bath to the victim located in the office (the Defendants were carrying out the sales agency in the memorial park in this case).

It appears that the money invested through C was not recovered, and the participation in the open demonstration at the time of this case.