logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.11.16 2016나53141
계약금반환 등
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, and this case is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance.

Two pages 16 of the judgment of the first instance court shall be changed to the same day " May 21, 2013".

The "investment" of 13 pages 13 of the decision of the court of first instance shall be changed to "transfer".

In addition, “The transfer of business under the Commercial Act is a bond contract, and there is no evidence to acknowledge that there was an explicit contract between the network C and the defendant,” as well as “the transfer of business under the Commercial Act,” in the 3th sentence of the first instance court.”

2. The judgment of the first instance court is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

arrow