beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
purport, purport, and.
Reasons
1. The court's explanation of this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following cases, and thus, this case is quoted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
Each "Defendant C Fisheries Partnership" shall be changed to each "Defendant I Fisheries Partnership."
In two pages 15 of the judgment of the first instance court, "(based on recognition)" is added to the facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 5, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings.
From the 3rd judgment of the first instance court, “Defendant B is obligated to return” to the 14th through the 12th judgment of the first instance court, the Defendants changed to the following: “The Defendants, in violation of the agreement on February 17, 2011, purchased the State in excess of the above agreed area, thereby obtaining unjust enrichment equivalent to the development cost of the excessive area (= approximately 423 square meters x KRW 150,000 per square meter x KRW 150,000 per square meter x 150,000 per square meter x 150,000), thereby incurring considerable loss to the Plaintiff; thus, the Defendants jointly have the obligation to return the above amount to the Plaintiff.”
After the 16th sentence of the first instance court's 3th sentence, "the fact-finding fact-finding" is added to "the fact-finding results and fact-finding results with respect to the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Mayor's Regional Headquarters."
The three pages 18 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be changed to the "purchase" of the three pages 18 of the judgment of the court of first instance, and it does not require the consent of G fishing village fraternity in the process."
After the judgment of the first instance court 4 pages 3, the following facts are acknowledged: “The Defendant agreed to pay to the Plaintiff KRW 300,000,000,000,000 to the Plaintiff for development costs of KRW 9917,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000