logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.06.30 2014나52988
손해배상(의)
Text

1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

The Defendants jointly set forth the Plaintiff KRW 75,090,542, and the said amount.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation on this part is as follows: “Defendant C’s user” of the first instance judgment No. 2, 13 is as follows: “Defendant C’s user on Nov. 23, 2002; Defendant C’s part on the part on the part on the part on the part on the part on the part on the part on the part on the part on the part on the part on the part on the part on which the Defendant C’s Defendant Hospital was established around Nov. 23, 200; Defendant C’s user; Defendant’s part on the part on the part on the part on the part on the part on the part on the part on the part of the third 7th 3rd 16:00 on the same day; Defendant’s 3rd 16th 13th 4th 13th 4th 13th 4th 4th 4th 4th 15th 5th 15th 2th 4th 201.

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. In light of the following circumstances, as a result of the commission of the medical record appraisal to the Korean Medical Association of the first instance court, the result of the commission of the physical examination to the head of the Korea Medical Doctor Association of the first instance court, the result of the fact-finding on the former Hospital of the first instance court and the result of the fact-finding on the former Hospital of the first instance court and the Korea Medical Association of the first instance court, the result of the fact-finding on the Korean Medical Doctor Association of the first instance court, and the overall purport of the oral argument, Defendant C neglected to exercise due care in selecting the method of the procedure at the time of the instant procedure and operating the medical procedure such as injection equipment, etc., and presumed that there is a considerable causal relationship with the above negligence, and there is no other counter-proof evidence.

① As a method of inception treatment for the escape certificate, it is a method of inception treatment for the escape certificate, one of the method of inception treatment for the climatic surgery (the procedure of this case belongs to the procedure of this case), and the method of inclimatic injection for the climatic scarde (the procedure of this case belongs to the procedure of climatic treatment), one of the method of inclimatic cli

arrow