All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.

The facts charged of this case

A. On December 19, 2019, Defendant B discovered a victim from the front line of the Dong-gu Daejeon, Daejeon on the 19:30th of December 19, 2019, on the same day, on the ground that the Defendant was unable to notify the victim A (Nam and 80 years of age) who was the lessor at his/her place of residence of his/her intention to go a director without notifying the victim A (the son and the 80th of age), the Defendant: (a) opened the first window; and (b) “I am well fright and well frightly live”; and (c) spit

B. In the event of a dispute with the victim B (manam, 40 years of age) at the time, place, as described in paragraph (1), Defendant A committed assaulting the victim’s breath by breathing the breath of dub, which took place on the vehicle in good faith

2. All the facts charged of the instant case are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the express will of the victim under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

On October 20, 2020, the Defendants withdrawn their wish to punish each other Defendant on the second day of the trial which was held on October 20, 2020.

Therefore, all of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.