The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. Around 01:00 on February 24, 2019, the Defendant reported to the police that the victim D (the victim, the 60-year-old age), who is a restaurant operator, did not appropriately pay the amount after eating food together with drinking in the C cafeteria located in Gyeonggi Kimpo-si B, and did not pay the amount of the fee. The Defendant reported to the police at the same time on this point. The Defendant provided the victim with “Chewing, Chewing, well-living, and well-being,” and provided the victim’s bath theory at least three times with the hand floor.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim.

2. Determination and conclusion are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and the above acts of the defendant cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent pursuant to Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, the above victim’s expression of intent not to punish the defendant after the institution of the instant prosecution is recognized. Thus, the prosecution is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.