1. On May 27, 2015, the Seoul Southern District Court No. 2495 issued on May 27, 2015 between the Plaintiff and the Defendants.

Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments as indicated in Gap evidence 1 through 7, the plaintiff owned the claim amounting to KRW 140,067,426 against the defendant Symsan Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Defendant Symsan"), from October 1, 2014 to November 30, 2014. On December 1, 2014, the decision of the court below 8,758,000 won against the defendant Symsan Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Symsan") was delivered to the defendant Symsan Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Symsan"), on the ground that the above decision of the court below was delivered to the defendant Symsan Co. 2, Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Symsan"), and that the above decision of the court below was delivered to the defendant Symsan Co. 2, Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Symsan Co. 3, 2014").

However, if the bonds are transferred double, the order between the assignee is not determined by the notification or consent after the date of the fixed date attached to the notification or consent, but by the debtor's recognition of the assignment of the bonds.